Why the Best Positioning Sounds Wrong

If everyone agrees with it immediately, it's probably not differentiated enough.

CONSENSUS HERE THE EDGE OF THE CURVE · 2026

If everyone agrees with your positioning immediately, it's probably not differentiated enough. Real positioning sounds wrong to most people the first time they hear it. That's a feature, not a bug. The job of a position is to make a specific group of people feel seen and the rest of the people feel like this isn't for them. If everyone nods, you've described a category. You haven't claimed a position inside it.

Most brand strategy work fails this test. The positioning gets refined and refined until it's universally palatable, at which point it's also universally forgettable. The thing that made it sharp got polished off because someone in a meeting said "I don't think customer X will like that." Customer X wasn't supposed to like it. That was the point.

THE FRICTION SIGNAL

When you write a position that does the work, you'll feel friction. Internally first. Someone on your team will push back. Someone will say "but what about people who want Y?" Someone will worry about alienating segment Z. The friction is the signal that you've actually said something. If there's no friction, you haven't.

The brands that have strong positions all sound slightly wrong to the people they're not for. Patagonia sounds wrong to people who don't care about the environment. Liquid Death sounds wrong to people who want their water bottles to look elegant. Trader Joe's sounds wrong to people who want a wide selection. Each of those brands is dominant in their actual market because they refused to be reasonable about who they were for.

WHY MOST BRANDS DON'T DO THIS

Because committing to a position requires giving up customers. The marketing team can model the customers you'll keep. They can't easily model the customers you'll attract by being more specific. So the math always favors hedging. Don't risk losing the people you have. Add a caveat. Soften the language. Make sure it could appeal to anyone.

The result is the kind of brand that has decent customer satisfaction and zero customer loyalty. Nobody loves it. Nobody fights for it. Nobody tattoos the logo. It's fine. Fine is the enemy. Fine is what you compete against on price because there's nothing else to compete on.

THE TEST

Read your positioning out loud to a competitor. If they hear it and think "we should do something like that too," your position is too generic. If they hear it and think "that's stupid, customers won't care about that," you might have something. The competitive reaction is the diagnostic.

Ask the same question of customers in segments you don't want. Read it to people who you've decided are not your customer. If they react with mild curiosity, you've hedged too much. If they react with active disinterest or mild offense, you're closer to right. The people you're not for should be able to tell from one sentence that you're not for them.

THE COURAGE PART

The reason most positioning is bad isn't analytical. It's emotional. The team knows the sharper version. They've discussed it. They've seen the test scores on the bolder option. They went with the safer one because the safer one felt less risky to defend.

The truth: defending the safe position is harder than defending the sharp one over time. Because the safe position has no internal logic. It can be argued in any direction. Every campaign needs to re-justify itself. Every quarter the pressure to "refresh" mounts. The sharp position has a logic. Once it's set, you can run plays inside it for a decade.

HOW TO ACTUALLY GET TO ONE

Stop asking "who is our customer?" That question always produces a description so broad it's useless. Ask "who is our customer such that we'd be willing to lose every other kind of customer to win them?" That question produces something you can build on.

Then test the position by reading it to the people it excludes. Watch their faces. If they look confused or mildly annoyed, keep it. If they look interested, sharpen it more. Repeat until the people you've decided not to serve actually understand they aren't the audience and stop arguing for changes.

That's the version that works. It will sound wrong to most of the room when you propose it. That's how you'll know.

About the Author

Ben Rotnicki is a marketer by calling who helps companies grow by leading revenue, retention, and loyalty through effective brand positioning, efficient customer acquisition, and digital strategy. With a background in wine, omnichannel retail, and hospitality, he specializes in e-commerce, CRM, loyalty, and subscription programs.

Different industries, same human problem — you turn transactions into relationships and relationships into habits.

Ben created Dante Peppermint, an AI-powered thinking partner designed to help users clarify ideas and make better decisions. Each Field Notes essay furthers his thinking by linking writing and reflection.

More about Ben →All Field Notes →

← All Field Notes